post-processing routines Search Results


post-processing routines  (Dassault Systemes)
90
Dassault Systemes post-processing routines
Variations of the Young’s modulus (MPa) and Poisson’s ratio of the interface between the screws and the bone for the <t> osseointegration </t> analysis.
Post Processing Routines, supplied by Dassault Systemes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/post-processing routines/product/Dassault Systemes
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
post-processing routines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
post-processing routines  (Bruker Corporation)
90
Bruker Corporation post-processing routines
Variations of the Young’s modulus (MPa) and Poisson’s ratio of the interface between the screws and the bone for the <t> osseointegration </t> analysis.
Post Processing Routines, supplied by Bruker Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/post-processing routines/product/Bruker Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
post-processing routines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
stau post-processing routine  (Abaqus Inc)
90
Abaqus Inc stau post-processing routine
Variations of the Young’s modulus (MPa) and Poisson’s ratio of the interface between the screws and the bone for the <t> osseointegration </t> analysis.
Stau Post Processing Routine, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/stau post-processing routine/product/Abaqus Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
stau post-processing routine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Variations of the Young’s modulus (MPa) and Poisson’s ratio of the interface between the screws and the bone for the osseointegration analysis.

Journal: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Article Title: Biomechanical Effects of a Cross Connector in Sacral Fractures – A Finite Element Analysis

doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.669321

Figure Lengend Snippet: Variations of the Young’s modulus (MPa) and Poisson’s ratio of the interface between the screws and the bone for the osseointegration analysis.

Article Snippet: The resulting maximum stresses for each repair strategy (without fixation, fixation without CC, fixation with CC), for all three loading conditions (Flexion, lateral bending and torsion) and for the nine levels of osseointegration ( min with interface stiffness comparable to cancellous bone, average with stiffness between cancellous and cortical bone and max with stiffness comparable to cortical bone) were calculated using post-processing routines in Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France).

Techniques:

Violin plots depicting the maximum principal stresses (absolute values) in the disk L5/S1 (A) , fifth lumbar vertebrae (B) and fracture area (D) and the von Mises stresses in the fixation device (C) in MPa, statistically validated in different variations of osseointegration (100 MPa to 10.000 MPa) for the axial rotation case. In the disk area L5/S1, the resulting effect of a cross connector was not significant [ F (1,8) = 1.391, p = 0.2721, SS = 8.89*10^-7, δ = 0.0004, subplot A]. In the lumbar vertebra L5 [ F (1,8) = 4.955, p = 0.0566, SS = 1842, δ = 20.23, subplot B] and fixational device [ F (1,8) = 100, p < 0.0001, SS = 0.68, post-hoc t-test t (16) = 0.6971, p = 0.4957, δ = 0.39, subplot C], the effect of a cross connector was not significant. In the fracture area, the resulting principal stresses (subplot D) were significantly lower after the addition of a cross connector [ F (1,8) = 2066, p < 0.0001, SS = 51.78, post-hoc t-test t (16) = 46.28, p < 0.0001, δ = 3.392] (Mean, 25th and 75th percentile).

Journal: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Article Title: Biomechanical Effects of a Cross Connector in Sacral Fractures – A Finite Element Analysis

doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.669321

Figure Lengend Snippet: Violin plots depicting the maximum principal stresses (absolute values) in the disk L5/S1 (A) , fifth lumbar vertebrae (B) and fracture area (D) and the von Mises stresses in the fixation device (C) in MPa, statistically validated in different variations of osseointegration (100 MPa to 10.000 MPa) for the axial rotation case. In the disk area L5/S1, the resulting effect of a cross connector was not significant [ F (1,8) = 1.391, p = 0.2721, SS = 8.89*10^-7, δ = 0.0004, subplot A]. In the lumbar vertebra L5 [ F (1,8) = 4.955, p = 0.0566, SS = 1842, δ = 20.23, subplot B] and fixational device [ F (1,8) = 100, p < 0.0001, SS = 0.68, post-hoc t-test t (16) = 0.6971, p = 0.4957, δ = 0.39, subplot C], the effect of a cross connector was not significant. In the fracture area, the resulting principal stresses (subplot D) were significantly lower after the addition of a cross connector [ F (1,8) = 2066, p < 0.0001, SS = 51.78, post-hoc t-test t (16) = 46.28, p < 0.0001, δ = 3.392] (Mean, 25th and 75th percentile).

Article Snippet: The resulting maximum stresses for each repair strategy (without fixation, fixation without CC, fixation with CC), for all three loading conditions (Flexion, lateral bending and torsion) and for the nine levels of osseointegration ( min with interface stiffness comparable to cancellous bone, average with stiffness between cancellous and cortical bone and max with stiffness comparable to cortical bone) were calculated using post-processing routines in Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France).

Techniques: